A cause factor in Administrative Resolution to exclude candidates."Comparative study" .

The cause element in administrative decisions is a cornerstone of administrative law, particularly when it comes to decisions that affect individuals’ rights, such as the exclusion of candidates from public positions or opportunities. This study examines the legal foundations, principles, and implications of the cause element in administrative decisions, focusing on comparative insights between different legal systems. The "cause" refers to the factual and legal justification underpinning an administrative decision. It ensures that decisions are neither arbitrary nor baseless, adhering to principles of legality, fairness, and reasonableness. In the context of candidate exclusion, the cause element involves verifying whether the stated reasons align with established legal frameworks, such as qualifications, ethical standards, or regulatory violations. This study compares how various legal systems approach the evaluation of the cause in administrative decisions. For instance, in common law jurisdictions, courts emphasize judicial review to assess whether decisions are supported by substantial evidence and procedural fairness. Meanwhile, civil law systems often provide detailed codifications that guide administrative authorities in substantiating their decisions. The analysis highlights key issues such as transparency, the burden of proof, and the balance between discretion and accountability. It underscores the need for clear legal standards to protect candidates from unjust exclusions while allowing administrative authorities to uphold institutional integrity. Ultimately, the study advocates for harmonizing practices to strengthen trust in administrative processes and ensure equitable treatment for candidates, leveraging lessons from diverse legal traditions to refine the.