The termination of the administrative dispute through reconciliation.

There is no doubt that reconciliation, whether as a term or an act, has a positive impact on the human psyche that brings about reassurance, instilling in the heart a feeling of tranquility. When reconciliation comes through the judiciary, it also becomes a source of trust; thus, judicial reconciliation has become one of the modern developments in the field of law, and reconciliation is merely a means of amicably terminating administrative disputes. The administrative judge, before imposing his will on the parties to the dispute, is required to address the will of the litigants and encourage them to settle the dispute amicably. His legal skills enable him to make the parties aware of their rights and their proper legal positions. His role as a formal legal representative of the state and the authority of the judiciary that surrounds him gives his clarifications a positive impact on the parties involved. He rightfully must explain to them that justice based on the agreement of the disputants yields more positive and effective results than the justice applied by the judge, which may lead them—if they truly understand their legal standings—to resolve their dispute amicably.