The country's obligation to confronting climate change"A comparative study"

Global interest has recently increased in the issue of climate change, its serious effects, and the dire consequences it will have in the future, to the point that it has become a crucial issue in our current era. Man has left his clear mark on the issue of climate change through the high rates of emission of anthropogenic greenhouse gases that cause global warming, which were the main cause of climate change, the global rise in temperatures, and the resulting catastrophic effects, such as the rise in water levels in the seas and oceans as a result of due to the melting of ice, and the resulting risk of floods, a threat to food security and other devastating effects. Therefore, it was necessary for the international legislator and the domestic legislator to take the necessary legislative measures to oblige all countries of the world to intervene and take the necessary executive measures and additional measures to reduce the emission of gases. Greenhouse greenhouse. There is no doubt that the judiciary played an undeniable role in obligating countries to take additional measures and executive measures to confront climate change. Rather, it was a vital tool for putting pressure on countries, especially developed countries that bear the greatest burden in confronting climate change, given that they were the largest cause of their occurrence. Obligating them to take effective measures to confront climate change.